Skip to main content

Chinese scientist claims world's first gene-edited babies, amid denial from hospital and international outcry


Scientist claims first gene-edited babies 

Hong Kong (CNN)The Chinese government has ordered an "immediate investigation" into the alleged delivery of the world's first genetically edited babies, as experts worldwide have voiced outrage at such use of the technology.
The pushback comes amid claims made online by scientist He Jiankui that twin girls had been born with DNA altered to make them resistant to HIV, a groundbreaking move that could spark huge scientific and ethical dilemmas.
He, a professor at Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, claims that his lab had been editing embryos' genetic codes for seven couples undergoing in-vitro fertilization.
In a video posted to YouTube on Monday, the Chinese researcher said that one of the pregnancies had been successful and that ostensibly healthy twin girls Lulu and Nana had been born "a few weeks ago."
    He claims that he used a tool known as CRISPR-cas9, which can insert or deactivate certain genes. In his YouTube video, He describes the procedure as having "removed the doorway through which HIV enters."
    But in a statement posted Tuesday morning, China's National Health Commission said that it had "immediately requested the Guangdong Provincial Health Commission to seriously investigate and verify" the claims made by He Jiankui.
    The statement follows a move by the Chinese hospital named in He's ethical approval documents, Shenzhen Harmonicare Women's and Children's Hospital, to deny all involvement in the procedures.
    "We can ensure that the research wasn't conducted in our hospital nor were the babies born here," a hospital representative told CNN. The hospital confirmed that two of the doctors named in He's documents work at the hospital and suggested that an internal investigation was underway.
    The Shenzhen Health and Family Planning Commission denounced the legitimacy of the hospital ethics committee and the review process that approved the application. It confirmed that an investigation was launched Monday to "verify the authenticity of the ethical review of the research reported by media."
    He's University, Southern University of Science and Technology, said in a statement that the researcher has been on leave since February 1.
    "The research work was carried out outside the school by Associate Professor He Jiankui. He did not report to the school or the department of biology. The university and the biology department are not aware of it," the institution said, adding that "the Academic Committee of the Department of Biology believes that it seriously violates academic ethics and academic norms."
    He's claims have neither been independently verified nor peer-reviewed. But if they're true, the procedure will raise significant ethical questions around gene editing and so-called designer babies.
    Editing the genes of embryos intended for pregnancy is banned in many counties, including the United States. In the UK, editing of embryos may be permitted for research purposes with strict regulatory approval. It is unknown whether the procedure is safe or, if used in pregnancy, whether it can have unintended consequences for the babies later in life or for future generations.

    A 'huge blow' to Chinese research

    A joint statement issued by more than 120 Chinese scientists on the Chinese social media site Weibo condemns the human genome-editing research.
    "The medical ethics review exists in the name only. Directly experimenting on human is nothing but crazy ... as soon as a living human is produced, no one could predict what kind of impact it will bring, as the modified inheritable substance will inevitably blend into human genome pool," they wrote, adding that the trial is a "huge blow" to the reputation of Chinese biomedical research. "It's extremely unfair to Chinese scientist who are diligent, innovative and defending the bottom line of scientific ethics."
    Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford, described the alleged births as "genetic Russian Roulette."
    "If true, this experiment is monstrous," he said. "The embryos were healthy. No known diseases. Gene editing itself is experimental and is still associated with off-target mutations, capable of causing genetic problems early and later in life, including the development of cancer.
    "There are many effective ways to prevent HIV in healthy individuals: For example, protected sex. And there are effective treatments if one does contract it," Savulescu said.
    Joyce Harper, a professor in genetics and human embryology at the Institute for Women's Health at University College London, described the alleged research "premature, dangerous and irresponsible," calling for public debate and legislation.
    Get CNN Health's weekly newsletter
    Sign up here to get The Results Are In with Dr. Sanjay Gupta every Tuesday from the CNN Health team.
    "Before this procedure comes anywhere near clinical practice, we need years of work to show that meddling with the genome of the embryo is not going to cause harm to the future person," she said in a statement.
    Yalda Jamshidi, senior lecturer in human genetics at St George's, University of London, pointed out that such controversial research is not necessary for preventing HIV.
    "We already have ways to prevent HIV infection and available treatments should it occur. We also do not need gene editing to ensure it isn't passed on to offspring," she said. "We know very little about the long-term effects, and most people would agree that experimentation on humans for an avoidable condition just to improve our knowledge is morally and ethically unacceptable."
      Despite ethical concerns in the West, a recent study suggested that the Chinese public is broadly in favor of using gene-editing for medical purposes. An online survey conducted by Sun Yat-Sen University in Guangzhou found that more than two-thirds of the 4,771 people surveyed (575 of whom reportedly have HIV), supported its use in treating diseases, according to the state-run tabloid Global Times.
      "(Chinese people) have a high willingness to use of gene in disease prevention and treatment," Liang Chen, a professor at Sun Yat-Sen University is quoted as saying. "This suggests that the research of gene editing in China not only has a promising potential, but also is responding to the public's needs."

      Comments

      Popular posts from this blog

      फरीदा खालिक खलक में ,खलक बसे रब माहि , मंदा किसनु आखिये जब इस बिन कोई नाहि।

      Virendra Sharma  shared a  post . 4 hrs  ·  kaabirakhadabazarmein.blogspot.com vaahgurujio.blogspot.com Shambhu Dayal Vajpayee 19 hrs ''भगवान श्री नारायण त्रिपति कहलाते हैं। तीन देवी - श्रीदेवी , भूदेवी और लीलादेवी के पति। हमें धारण - पालन करने वाली पृथ्‍वी देवी के पति नारायण  हैं। इसी लिए सुबह उठने के बाद धरती माता की वंदना कर पग रखने की परंपरा है।जो गुजरात में द्वारिकानाथ हैं वही दक्षिण भारत में श्रीवेंकटेश बालाजी महाराज हैं। दोनों चतुर्भज। बाला जी महाराज का नाम है त्रिपतिबाला जी । मूल संस्‍कृत शब्‍द त्रिपति का अपभ्रंश तिरुपति हो गया और लोग तिरुपति बालाजी कहने लगे।'' ...... .......................... '' काशी - अयोध्‍या की तरफ अभिवादन में राम -राम कहने की परंपरा है। दो बार ही बोलते हैं, एक या तीन बार नहीं। ऐसा क्‍यों ? इसके पीछे भावना है कि मुझ को जो दिखता है , मेरे सामने वाला , वह मेरा राम है और मेरे अंदर भी तेरा राम है। मैं राम जी के प्रकाश से जगत को देख पाता हूं। राम जी मुझे प्रकाश देते हैं। जो दीख

      SAPODILLA Facts and Health Benefits (HINDI )

      Sapodilla त्वरित तथ्य नाम: Sapodilla वैज्ञानिक नाम: चीकू मूल दक्षिणी मैक्सिको, मध्य अमेरिका और कैरेबियन। इसके अलावा थाईलैंड, भारत, कंबोडिया, मलेशिया, बांग्लादेश और इंडोनेशिया में खेती की। रंग की हल्के पीले - दानेदार बनावट के साथ भूरे रंग आकृतियाँ अंडाकार या दीर्घवृत्ताभ, व्यास: 2-4 इंच (5-10 सेमी) मांस रंग भूरा स्वाद मिठाई कैलोरी 200 Kcal./cup मेजर पोषक तत्वों विटामिन सी (39.33%) कार्बोहाइड्रेट (37.00%) आहार फाइबर (33.68%) आयरन (24.13%) कॉपर (23.00%) स्वास्थ्य सुविधाएं तनाव से छुटकारा दिलाता है, ठंड से बचाता है, एनीमिया से बचाता है, गठिया को कम, भर देता है घाव Sapodilla बारे में तथ्यों दक्षिणी मैक्सिको, मध्य अमेरिका और कैरेबियन के मूल निवासी, Sapodilla अब थाईलैंड, मलेशिया, कंबोडिया, भारत, इंडोनेशिया, बांग्लादेश और मेक्सिको में खेती की जाती है। यह फिलीपींस स्पेनिश उपनिवेशण के दौरान पेश किया गया था। ब्राउन शुगर, सर्जनात्मक, रसेल, और टिकल: वहाँ Sapodilla के चार किस्में हैं। ब्राजील: Sapodilla भी विभिन्न स्थानीय भाषा / आम नाम से जाना जाता है Sapoti; जर्मन: Brei

      What is in soda?

      What is in soda? Let’s talk about the ingredients in a few of the most common sodas. First, they have water and carbon dioxide, which is what makes it fizz. That in itself isn’t bad. The other ingredients are really where the problem lies: sugar or high fructose corn syrup, phosphoric acid, and some sort of coloring agent. They also have caffeine. I won’t talk much about caffeine because I don’t think this is the biggest problem with soda. People are hooked on soda even if it is caffeine free. Let’s explore these individually. Sugar or High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) If you don’t do this already, you should actively scavenge the food labels of anything you buy. When you look at the ingredients, make sure that it has no HFCS. HFCS is cheaper than regular sugar. It has replaced sugar as the sweetener of choice for many products. There is plenty of research that shows this to be worse than sugar. It increases your risk of heart disease, makes it easier for you to gain weight a